massachusetts freedom petitions

Massachusetts Memorial and Petition for Freedom




Inspired by the debates surrounding colonists’ protests against British abuses of power, “many Slaves, living in the Town of Boston, and other Towns in this Province,” petitioned for their freedom and other “liberties” in January 1773.  Led by Felix Holbrook and joined by other Black signatories such as Chester Joie, Sambo Freeman, and Peter Bestes, their campaign would ultimately garner the support of leading white patriots in Boston and other towns throughout Massachusetts. Their 1773 appeal, while not immediately successful, would influence the new constitution of 1780 and help lead to the effective and legal abolition of slavery in their state. 

Below are two of the petitioners’ appeals, both presented to the General Court of Massachusetts in 1774, and both reprinted in the patriot newspaper, The Massachusetts Spy. In these documents we may witness the petitioners’ masterful familiarity with and use of Christian, republican, and natural rights discourse to make their case. Insisting on their dignity as men, they claimed a “right to demand” of the patriot opposition “in such a way, and in such a manner as your Honours would expect from such a body of fellowmen, professing the gospel of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.” In the act of petitioning they also reveal their consummate expertise in navigating Massachusetts’s political and legal system. Making an oblique reference to the famed case Somerset v. Steuart, for instance, they argue how “there is no law of Great-Britain, nor yet in this province, whereby we can be held in slavery without our consent.” The authors of these documents ultimately joined the colonial opposition to help bring about the downfall of royal government in Massachusetts, praying that “we may rejoice when you rejoice.” Endorsed by local patriot luminaries such as James Swan and John Allen, their efforts were published frequently in patriot newspapers, like the Spy, and their campaign inspired towns and counties across Massachusetts to voice their opposition to slavery, or to even endorse civil equality. Though little information remains about any of these men during the American War for Independence, Holbrook would volunteer to fight in the Rhode Island militia and Primus Hall, the son of another petitioner, Prince Hall, enlisted with the Massachusetts 5th Regiment.

Alongside these appeals there is also pictured the final draft of the last bill in the Massachusetts Provincial Congress in 1777 that the petitioners inspired during their campaign. It guaranteed not only the abolition of slavery, but also granted freed people “all the freedom Rights, privileges, & immunities” as citizens of the state. Though this bill did not pass, Nathaniel Peasely Sargeant, who drafted the bill, would later play a crucial role in court cases that outlawed slavery. He was Associate Justice when the state’s Supreme Court outlawed slavery in Commonwealth v. Jennison (1783). Moreover, the movement the freedom petitioners unleashed would make a lasting impact on revolutionary discourse and the fate of slavery in the North. These petitions were almost certainly the source of inspiration for copycat petitions that emerged in New Hampshire, Connecticut, and nationally in 1778, 1779, 1797, and 1800, and they influenced St. George Tucker’s bill for gradual emancipation in Virginia in 1796.The freedom petitions helped launch a strategy for abolition and amelioration of Black slavery and improvements in their civil status that lasted well into the nineteenth century. Among the first to interpret the Declaration of Independence as committing the nation to the principle of human equality – in their last appeal, they note “they have, in common with all other Men, a natural & unalienable right” to freedom – the freedom petitioners also helped first give voice to one of the richest refrains in America’s language of liberty. 

Questions to Consider:

  1. How were Black colonists able to influence Massachusetts political and legal system? Why might they have been unable to play a similar role in colonies like South Carolina? 
  2. Why might white patriots in Massachusetts, like The Massachusetts Spy editor Isaiah Thomas, be interested in supporting the petitioners’ campaign? 
  3. Compare these documents to Lord Dunmore’s proclamation of November 1775. Recent scholarship suggests that the same number of African American men fought for the patriots as for the British (though these figures are still subject to revision). What factors might have led Black colonists to make the decisions they did when enlisting with one side or the other? 
  4. What kinds of claims to rights did these petitions make, and on what basis?

Grant Stanton

Further Reading
  • David Brion Davis, The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770-1823 (Ithaca, NY: CUP, 1975)
  • Benjamin Quarles, The Negro in the American Revolution (Chapel Hill, NC: UNCP, 1961)
  • Manisha Sinha, The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition (New Haven, CT: YUP, 2016)
  • Grant Stanton, “The Freedom Petitions: Black Patriotism, Black Politics, and the Abolition of Slavery in Massachusetts, 1773-1783,” Early American Studies (forthcoming)
  • George Washington Williams, A History of the Negro Race in America from 1619 to 1880 (New York, NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1883)
Cite this page
Slavery Law & Power in Early America and the British Empire (June 9, 2023) Massachusetts Memorial and Petition for Freedom (1774). Retrieved from
"Massachusetts Memorial and Petition for Freedom (1774)." Slavery Law & Power in Early America and the British Empire - June 9, 2023,
Slavery Law & Power in Early America and the British Empire August 21, 2022 Massachusetts Memorial and Petition for Freedom (1774)., viewed June 9, 2023,<>
Slavery Law & Power in Early America and the British Empire - Massachusetts Memorial and Petition for Freedom (1774). [Internet]. [Accessed June 9, 2023]. Available from:
"Massachusetts Memorial and Petition for Freedom (1774)." Slavery Law & Power in Early America and the British Empire - Accessed June 9, 2023.
"Massachusetts Memorial and Petition for Freedom (1774)." Slavery Law & Power in Early America and the British Empire [Online]. Available: [Accessed: June 9, 2023]
  • Transcription
  • Document

Massachusetts Freedom Petitions

Mr. Thomas,
You are requested to publish the following Address of the Africans, to the Council and house of Representatives.
To the honourable his Majesty’s Council and the honourable House of Representatives of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay, in General Court assembled, at Boston, the 20th day of January, 1774.
THE many stedfast resolutions made by this large province, to maintain their liberties and privileges, wherewith GOD hath made them free (without which no man, even the meanest of them can be happy in this life, for what is life without the enjoyment of it?) gives us who are unhappily, and unjustly deprived of that blessing; so great expectations of your taking up our last petition which we laid before your Honours the last sessions; and give us the thousands of poor unhappy Africans their freedom, which we as men, and by nature have a right to demand of your Honours in such a way, and in such a manner as your Honours would expect from such a body of fellowmen, professing the gospel of our Lord and Saviour JESUS CHRIST; we ask nothing from your Honours but what you would desire yourselves, were you in our situation: Nay even the very dumb beasts groan under the heavy load of slavery, and try all manner of ways to get rid of it; much more men who are made after the image of GOD, and have the sense of feeling, cannot but groan under this unjust burden laid upon us, without any colour of justice, but pleasure and custom, and against the wills or consents of our forefathers, or us their children: But since the all-wise GOD hath seen fit to permit it to be so for a number of years past, his will be done, we desire to submit to his will in all things; yet from the first settling of this province It was not so. But yet we can sincerely hope and pray, that GOD would preserve your liberties and privileges as at the beginning, and that peace and love may again be restored between the mother country and the provinces, and that his Majesty would hear your prayers, and that you would hear ours, and grant us an answer of peace, that we may rejoice when you rejoice, as well as mourn when you mourn, as we do this day; and as we are not void of fellow-feeling, we conclude we must be men.

[From The Massachusetts Spy, Sept. 8, 1774, page 1]
To his Excellency THOMAS GAGE, Esquire, Governor of the Province of MASSACHUSETTS-BAY, in NEW-ENGLAND; to the Honorable his Majesty’s COUNCIL, and the Honorable House of REPRESENTATIVES, in General Court assembled at SALEM, A.D. 1774. The Petition being the Third of us the Subscribers, in Behalf of all those, who by divine Permission, are held in a State of Slavery, within the Bowels of a FREE COUNTRY, humbly sheweth,
THAT your petitioners apprehend they have in common with other men, a natural right to be free, and without molestation, to enjoy such property, as they may acquire by their industry, or by any other means not detrimental to their fellow-men; and that no person can have any just claim to their services without their consenting by contract to become servants; we were dragged by the cruel hands of power (some of us) from our dearest connections, and others stolen from the bosoms of tender parents, and brought hither to be enslaved. Thus are we deprived of every thing that has a tendency to make life even tolerable. The endearing ties of husband, wife, parent, children, friends; children did we say? Alas! No sooner are they born, but they are either sold or given away helpless, without our consent, whereby we are rendered ignorant of them and they of us; and whenever any of those connections are formed amongst us, the pleasures are embittered by the cruel consideration of our slavery. By our deplorable situation we are rendered incapable of shewing our obedience to the Supreme Governor of the Universe, by being obliged to conform ourselves to the duties which naturally grow out of such relations, how can a slave perform the duties of husband or parent, wife or child? We are often under the cruel necessity of obeying man, not only in the omission of, but frequently in opposition to the laws of GOD, so inimical is slavery to religion! As we are hindered by our situation from an observance of the laws of GOD, so we cannot reap an equal benefit from the laws of the land with other subjects.
There is no law of Great-Britain, nor yet in this province, whereby we can be held in slavery without our consent. We are sensible that many objections have, and may be objected against our liberation; but we with gratitude to those honorable gentlemen who spoke so much in our favor last sessions though some may say we were amused, these with many other grievances we feel, we your humble petitioners hope your Excellency and Honors will again take up this our third petition, and cause an act or resolve to be passed to give your petitioners redress.
The candor and humanity of your Excellency, and the trust we put in the honorable House, encourage us to hope, that same method will be fallen upon to grant such a number of his Majesty’s subjects, and useful members of society effectual relief.
And your petitioners as in duty bound, shall ever pray.

EARLY ACCESS:  Transcription is under editorial review and may contain errors.
Please do not cite or otherwise reproduce without permission.